🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has stated to have harvested a vast number of songs from Spotify and is preparing to release them online.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers noted the seeming leak could aid AI companies searching for material to train their models.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its full catalog.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a Spotify representative.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a external actor collected public metadata and employed illicit methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Group's Stated Mission and Concerns

The streaming service does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They asserted the audio files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ rights, remarked the leaked music would probably be utilized for developing AI models.

“Educating models on illegally sourced data is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this stolen music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to a large online archive, a huge online repository of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its systems.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in principle “create their own personal free version of the service”. The executive added it could also allow technology firms to “educate models on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between artists, writers and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Proposals and Responses

Across Britain, creative professionals have protested against a ministerial proposal to let AI companies use copyright-protected work without consent unless the owner signals. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ concerns.

A government minister for science, research and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The government has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.